Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> But that does not necessarily mean swapping the parent order would > >> produce the history of a right shape, either, even for those with > >> the "first-parent chain is the trunk" worldview. > > > > Why not? > > I gave detailed write-up in two discussion threads linked already in > this thread from 2013 and 2014; as I said, I do not think we want to > debate that as part of the discussion of this documentation fix. Sure, the discussion about the order of the parents is orthogonal to the discussion of this particular documentation fix, but my comment that the order of the parents is "obviously wrong" is correct. Even you said so yourself in the 2013/2014 threads (I would gladly provide the links if you require them). I've spent several man-days re-reading the old threads (multiple times even, and not just the ones from 2013/1014), and I just spent several man-hours re-reading them yet again today. My conclussion remains: the fact that the behavior is wrong is not debatable (at least in some of the circumstances). I will provide a summary in a different thread soon. -- Felipe Contreras
