Re: [PATCH 3/7] merge-ort: add pool_alloc, pool_calloc, and pool_strndup wrappers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 8:55 AM Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We need functions which will either call
>     xmalloc, xcalloc, xstrndup
> or
>     mem_pool_alloc, mem_pool_calloc, mem_pool_strndup
> depending on whether we have a non-NULL memory pool.  Add these
> functions; the next commit will make use of these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>

Patch [2/7] feels somewhat incomplete without the utility functions
introduced by this patch (and, indeed, when reading [2/7], I was
wondering how you were going to deal with the potential NULL pointer).
>From a review standpoint, I could easily see [2/7] and [3/7] presented
as a single patch, but it's not worth a re-roll.

> diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c
> @@ -683,6 +683,30 @@ static void path_msg(struct merge_options *opt,
> +MAYBE_UNUSED
> +static void *pool_calloc(struct mem_pool *pool, size_t count, size_t size)
> +{
> +       if (!pool)
> +               return xcalloc(count, size);
> +       return mem_pool_calloc(pool, count, size);
> +}
> +
> +MAYBE_UNUSED
> +static void *pool_alloc(struct mem_pool *pool, size_t size)
> +{
> +       if (!pool)
> +               return xmalloc(size);
> +       return mem_pool_alloc(pool, size);
> +}
> +
> +MAYBE_UNUSED
> +static void *pool_strndup(struct mem_pool *pool, const char *str, size_t len)
> +{
> +       if (!pool)
> +               return xstrndup(str, len);
> +       return mem_pool_strndup(pool, str, len);
> +}
> +



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux