On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > This series implements a suggestion by Jeff King to use an idiom for > *_init() functions that avoids duplicating what we've declared in the > corresponding *_INIT macros. See > https://lore.kernel.org/git/YNytp0JAIaQih0Y4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ These all look pretty good to me. My comments are minor enough that I'll include them here rather than individual replies: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (5): > *.h: move some *_INIT to designated initializers I agree with Martin's suggestion to prefer the designated initializer for STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP. The consistency makes it easier to read. > *.c *_init(): define in terms of corresponding *_INIT macro Yep, nice. > dir.[ch]: replace dir_init() with DIR_INIT I like this. Since there is a dir_clear(), I guess somebody could argue that lacking an init function makes things less consistent/balanced. But if we don't need it, I'm happy to drop it. > string-list.[ch]: add a string_list_init_{nodup,dup}() I like this. I agree the current "0/1" in the callers is kind of inscrutable. It does make things harder if we wanted to add more options, but that is already true due to the macro initializers. > string-list.h users: change to use *_{nodup,dup}() Nice. IMHO you should drop the convenience wrapper here. Leaving it means we'll have to circle back later and fix up topics in flight (and it's not atomic; when we finally drop it, there may be more topics in flight then!). If it were somehow complicated to convert callers, that might be more justified. But doing a quick conversion (which is easily detected by the compiler) in the merge commit seems like less work than having to revisit the topic later. -Peff
