Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 27 2021, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Personally I prefer to run prove instead, because the output is less > > verbose, and there's a nice summary at the end: > > > > prove t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh > > I also like "prove" better (well, I added the support for it, so > ...). It's generally better to use e.g.: > > make test DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove GIT_PROVE_OPTS="--jobs $(nproc)" Or just add "-j$(nproc)" to ~/.proverc so you don't need to specify GIT_PROVE_OPTS every time. > Since we do some basic checking via the Makefile that effectively form a > part of our tests. > > FWIW for your one-liner it can be just: > > prove t[0-9]*.sh > > Alex: You might also find that if you specify --root as the path to a > ramdisk the tests are much faster, e.g. on my Linux boxes I set > --root=/run/user/`id -u`/git. Or TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY=/tmp/git. -- Felipe Contreras
