Re: [PATCH] pull: abort by default if fast-forwarding is impossible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 9:16 PM Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Elijah Newren wrote:
> >
> > > The code changes look good, but you'll need to add several test
> > > changes as well, or this code change will cause test failures.
> >
> > Wouldn't you consider sending a patch without running 'make test'
> > "cavalier"?
> >
> > > Thanks for working on this.
> >
> > Such a completely different tone for a "cavalier" patch depending 100%
> > on the person who sent it. Weird.
> 
> First of all, attacking a random bystander like Alex is rather
> uncalled for.

I did not attack Alex, I simply pointed out the fact that his patch
breaks the test suite, which you did too.

I asked *you* if you didn't consider this "cavalier". Your reaction
seems inconsistent. This question has nothing to do with Alex.

I don't throw personal attacks, nor do I chastise contributors for
attempting to improve the project. That's your department.

I focus on the ball, not the player.

-- 
Felipe Contreras



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux