On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 04:57, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Avishay Matayev wrote: > > > Some git commands use a pager, which is usually a program that needs a > > pty to function properly (`less`, for example). Fugitive can't really > > use a pty for the pager as vim runs its subprocesses without a pty. > > Therefore Fugitive just creates its own pager (which is a simple > > window in vim) and pastes the git command output there. > > That's not necessarily true; vim uses a bunch of convoluted logic to > sometimes use a pty, but that depends on the mode used (graphical vs. > console), and a bunch of other things. > > Even more complicated when you throw nvim into the mix. > > But yeah, for the sake of simplication let's say that's true. True, I did oversimplify. > > We had some ideas how to make this feasible (as you can read on the > > thread) but for brevity's sake I'll present the best (IMO) idea: > > Essentially, at `pager.c`, don't short-circuit in `git_pager` (or > > `setup_pager`?) due to pty absence if a new environment variable is > > present, perhaps something like `GIT_PAGER_FORCE` which will override > > the `PAGER` and `GIT_PAGER` variables. This will allow Fugitive to > > apply custom logic through to pager to know if one exists and present > > the window in vim. > > Seems like a completely sensible request to me, except I would do it a > slightly different place: > > --- a/pager.c > +++ b/pager.c > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ void prepare_pager_args(struct child_process *pager_process, const char *pager) > > void setup_pager(void) > { > - const char *pager = git_pager(isatty(1)); > + const char *pager = git_pager(git_env_bool("GIT_PAGER_FORCE", isatty(1))); > > if (!pager) > return; > > I'm Cc'ing Jonathan Nieder who seems to have toched these lines. > > Cheers. > > -- > Felipe Contreras Well I'm glad to hear you find it sensible, though your patch suggests that `GIT_PAGER_FORCE` will be a boolean, while I expect it to be an actual pager, which would make more sense IMO. Avishay