Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Junio C Hamano wrote: >>>> Assuming that we do not give the old git-p4import script >>>> packaged in "git-p4 package", would the following patch be all >>>> that is needed, or do we need other things in the spec file? >>>> >>>> -- snipsnap clipcrap -- >>>> +Obsoletes: git-p4 >>> That depends. If packages outside of git requires the git-p4 package >>> to function then this will not suffice and a line saying >>> >>> Provides: git-p4 >>> >>> would have to be added instead. >> >> Not instead, but in addition IIRC (it obsoletes the package and >> provides the feature). But that would be nonsensical if the outside >> package indeed requires git-p4 and we don't have it in our current >> RPM: the purpose of dependencies is to not have things break silently, >> and lying about what we provide would be wrong. > > No, it really is instead. A package obsoleting one of the features > it provides itself would be insane. Not according to my understanding: "Obsoletes:" concerns _packages_, while "Provides:" concerns features. So it is perfectly feasible to obsolete a previously separate package and provide its functionality. And indeed, our "emacs-auctex" package _both_ obsoletes _and_ provides "auctex". And it is not like we did not learn this the hard way... -- David Kastrup - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
