Sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib >> and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in >> the first place. > ... > As an aside, when I sent the patch removing git-p4import from the spec > file I mentioned that I had no way to test it and asked for testers. > Git needs a spec file maintainer so that issues like this can be caught > before release. Without a maintainer, it should probably be demoted > to contrib itself. For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_ ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status already. Don't distro people do their own RPM packages, instead of using what I placed on k.org? Assuming that we do not give the old git-p4import script packaged in "git-p4 package", would the following patch be all that is needed, or do we need other things in the spec file? -- snipsnap clipcrap -- diff --git a/git.spec.in b/git.spec.in index fe7b3d8..3d56e17 100644 --- a/git.spec.in +++ b/git.spec.in @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Source: http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRequires: zlib-devel >= 1.2, openssl-devel, curl-devel, expat-devel %{!?_without_docs:, xmlto, asciidoc > 6.0.3} BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Requires: git-core, git-svn, git-cvs, git-arch, git-email, gitk, git-gui, perl-Git +Obsoletes: git-p4 %description Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
