On Mon, 3 September 2007, Petr "Pasky" Baudis wrote: > To hijack this post a bit, another patch in the queue (the incremental > blame thingie) introduces blame.js. Do you think that we should keep the > .js files separate, or instead have one big gitweb.js with everything? > I'm inclined to the second possibility in order to reduce the number of > requests, but it comes at a price of slightly worse maintainability. On the other hand if we have blame.js separate, we could load it (require it) only for the 'blame' view, it means only when needed. gitweb.js would contain JavaScript code used by all (or almost all) views, then... I don't think gitweb.js would be as large as gitweb.perl, if we are talking about maintability ;-) -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
