Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月5日周六 下午2:45写道:
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:42 AM ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I want to mention another question:
> > If I have a new patch series about %(rest) is based on the current %(raw)
> > patch series, should I submit it immediately?
>
> Yeah, I think it's ok to send it as long as you explicitly specify
> (using a link for example) the patch series on the mailing list it
> depends on.

Ok. Because %(raw:textconv) %(raw:filter) dependent on %(raw) and %(rest),
%(raw) seems to have experienced a long cycle. These codes about new atoms
seem to stay in my local git repo for a long time. It may be a good thing to
send them earlier. :)

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux