Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月5日周六 下午12:49写道:
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:34 AM ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Christian,
> >
> > Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年6月4日周五 下午8:53写道:
> > >
> > > No need to resend as it's a cover letter, but just in case there is
> > > another round and you copy things from this cover letter:
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, what is the bad place in this cover letter I write? This
> > cover letter is also different from the last time ...
>
> I was talking about the grammatical issues below in the cover letter.
> Sometimes people copy things, for example a text explaining what the
> patch series is about, from the cover letter of version N to the cover
> letter of version N + 1, so I thought that telling you about
> grammatical issues in this cover letter could perhaps help you if you
> have to write another cover letter for another version of this patch
> series.

Ok, I get it.

I want to mention another question:
If I have a new patch series about %(rest) is based on the current %(raw)
patch series, should I submit it immediately?

Thanks.
--
ZheNing Hu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux