Re: [PATCH] t1092: use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY for consistent results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:54:56AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stepping back a bit, this is an unattended test---why do we even see
> progress meters?  Are we forcing the output to tty somehow in our
> tests, or do some codepaths forget to ask isatty() when the command
> line does not say --progress or --no-progress?

I found this while responding to Randall (who is observing the same
problem in another thread):

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/YK0TKVZidW%2FG8XBr@nand.local/

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux