On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:57:52AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Mon, May 24 2021, Taylor Blau wrote: > > > But I don't think this isolated instance should push in the direction of > > adding support for either of the above, regardless of how easy it might > > be. > > I don't see why we wouldn't just tweak GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY to support -1 > or something for "inf". Ironically, I think that this already works, since we parse the value of GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY as unsigned, and don't bother checking for if the input is negative (since we eventually call git_parse_unsigned(), which doesn't have any extra checks other than for overflow). So we silently convert -1 to 2^64-1, and call it a day. Thanks, Taylor
