Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:25:16AM CEST, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Luben Tuikov wrote: >> >> > So what's the review process now? >> >> Umm. Pasky set it up, so it's Pasky who decides what goes in and what >> not. What exactly is your problem? > > Junio will pull from it, so he has full right to ask. :-) Well, I won't blindly pull from it, but honestly when it comes to gitweb I trust Pasky's judgement as much as I trust myself, if not even more. And I think the review process Pasky described is good --- people will see both the patches on the list and code in action at repo.or.cz/. I am a bit worried about the 'master' being a "StGIT stack", though. Playgrounds to be cherry-picked from (aka 'pu') would make *perfect* sense to be managed that way (and the topics that go only 'pu' of git.git itself are managed the same except that I do not do so using StGIT), but I think we need a stable history for the branch git.git will eventually pull from. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
