Hi, On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:25:16AM CEST, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > > --- Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > due to popular (Junio's) demand, I have set up a gitweb-oriented fork > > > of git at repo.or.cz: > > > > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gitweb.git > > > > > > It is meant as a hub for various gitweb-related patches and > > > development efforts. So far it is pre-seeded by the patches repo.or.cz's > > > gitweb uses. > > > > Is this right? > > > > So what's the review process now? > > Umm. Pasky set it up, so it's Pasky who decides what goes in and what > not. What exactly is your problem? Junio will pull from it, so he has full right to ask. :-) As I wrote in the web README, to enter #next your patch should see some git@ review; that holds for repo.or.cz patches as well as for any other patches. I suppose we will sort out the exact distinction between #next and #master on the fly; the general idea is that patches that go on #master have more or less approached perfectness. ;-) -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Early to rise and early to bed makes a male healthy and wealthy and dead. -- James Thurber - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
