Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> ... >> > I just tested on a busybox clone: Works as expected. Without your patch, >> > I get the uninitialised values, with your patch it is fine. >> > >> > ACK. >> >> Thanks. >> >> It's customary that the privilege to issue Ack is reserved to >> the primary owner of the code. We are a relatively small >> friendly community and it is not a big deal, but if you ever >> work on the kernel, be somewhat more careful. People are picky >> over there on such details. > > Happily, we are a much friendlier bunch here ;-) > > Besides, since I feel we're really close to 1.5.3 now, I thought that you > might want to here as many positive votes as you can get. > > But yes, I'll keep that in mind ;-) Oh, I did not mean to sound like your testing does not count. I was just cautioning about using the word "Ack". I will have a "Tested-by: " line with your name on it, and I am hoping I can get an Ack from Eric but it is such an "obviously correct" looking change, so ... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
