Re: [PATCH] diff: resurrect the traditional empty "diff --git" behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:13:42PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> 
> >> > If you set diff.autorefreshindex configuration variable, it
> >> > squelches the empty "diff --git" output, and at the end of the
> >> > command, it automatically runs "update-index --refresh" without
> >> > even bothering the user.  In other words, with the configuration
> >> > variable set, people who do not care about the cache-dirtyness
> >> > do not even have to see the warning.
> >> 
> >> Nice. This is much more sane behavior, IMHO, and I think it should make 
> >> everyone happy.
> >
> > I could even imagine that this will eventually become the standard 
> > behaviour.
> 
> You sound as if you _like_ that behaviour...

Heh.  Almost.  I'd like to believe that these complaints would stop.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux