Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:44:12AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I did not even want to apply that "empty diff --git removal"
> patch.  I certainly do _NOT_ want to suppress that replacement
> warning anywhere.
> 
> You are seriously tempting me to revert the commit
> fb13227e089f22dc31a3b1624559153821056848 (git-diff: squelch
> "empty" diffs)...

FWIW, I find the new message terribly ugly compared to the old behavior.
There have been many output changes that I didn't like at first, but for
which I held my tongue and eventually grew to like when they became more
familiar (e.g., the 'subject' line after git-commit).

But I just can't seem to find this one anything but ugly; everytime I
see it, I involuntarily cringe. Perhaps because it really looks like an
error message that accidentally got stuck in the diff output through
incompetent redirection of stdout/stderr.

I say this not to start a flame war (which is perhaps inevitable), but I
just wonder if others feel the same, now that they have had a chance to
get used to it.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux