Re: [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 05:32:08AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:14:25AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > 
> > > Without `override` all additions will be ignored by make.
> > 
> > That's true of all of our Makefile variables. Is there a particular
> > reason to give this one special treatment?
> 
> To go into further detail: usually we distinguish variables we use
> internally from user-facing ones, and include the latter in the former.
> I see a later patch wants to start passing ASCIIDOC_EXTRA on the
> command-line, and we'd use two variables for that.

Well, it's not exactly user-facing; it's only needed for doc-diff.

Would TEST_ASCIIDOC_EXTRA make sense?

-- 
Felipe Contreras



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux