Re: [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA
From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 05:32:08 -0400
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx>, "brian m . carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210514121435.504423-2-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
References: <20210514121435.504423-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20210514121435.504423-2-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:14:25AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> Without `override` all additions will be ignored by make.

That's true of all of our Makefile variables. Is there a particular
reason to give this one special treatment?

-Peff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA
  - From: Jeff King

References:
- [PATCH 00/11] doc: asciidoctor: direct man page creation and fixes
  - From: Felipe Contreras
- [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA
  - From: Felipe Contreras

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] doc: remove unnecessary rm instances
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/11] doc: doc-diff: allow more than one flag
Previous by thread: [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/11] doc: allow the user to provide ASCIIDOC_EXTRA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux