Yuri wrote: > On 5/6/21 1:40 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > No. Commits are most definitely not public. Not unless you do > > `git push`, and only if you push to a public repository. > > > > I have countless commits on local branches that nobody would every see. > > Many on a "tmp" branch. > > So you advocate to use branches? If branches are same or better than > stash, why was the stash feature created? Branches are for long-term sequences of useful commits. Stashes are for short-term crappy commits. They serve a different purpose. -- Felipe Contreras
