On 5/6/21 1:40 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
No. Commits are most definitely not public. Not unless you do `git push`, and only if you push to a public repository. I have countless commits on local branches that nobody would every see. Many on a "tmp" branch.
So you advocate to use branches? If branches are same or better than stash, why was the stash feature created?
Maybe it should be removed in favor of branches? Yuri
