On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:01:50 -0600, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 27 2021, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > > From: Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > It's a dumb test, but it's surprisingly easy to break. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh > > index 5c2510f1f5..9afba2f282 100755 > > --- a/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh > > +++ b/contrib/subtree/t/t7900-subtree.sh > > @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ last_commit_subject () { > > git log --pretty=format:%s -1 > > } > > > > +test_expect_success 'shows short help text for -h' ' > > + test_expect_code 129 git subtree -h >out 2>err && > > + test_must_be_empty err && > > + grep -e "^ *or: git subtree pull" out && > > + grep -e --annotate out > > I wonder if "grep -e --could-be-an-option-if-not-for-e" is portable, > probably.... It's POSIX, and at least works on GNU, busybox, and macOS (based-on-FreeBSD) grep. If it turns out there's somewhere it doesn't work, I'd be happy to change it, but my baseline assumption is that it's portable. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker