On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:45:10 -0600, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27 2021, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > Use test-lib.sh's `test_count`, instead instead of having > > t7900-subtree.sh do its own book-keeping with `subtree_test_count` that > > has to be explicitly incremented by calling `next_test`. > > This just retains an existing pattern and all that, but I think this > pattern of testing makes for hard to read & maintain tests. It looks > like all of these could just be: > > test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && > git init repo && > [...] > > I.e. the only thing that's being done here is to piggy-back on the test > count to create a unique repo. Thanks for the tip, I'll do that for any new tests I add, going forward. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker
