On Tue, Apr 27 2021, Luke Shumaker wrote: > From: Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Use test-lib.sh's `test_count`, instead instead of having > t7900-subtree.sh do its own book-keeping with `subtree_test_count` that > has to be explicitly incremented by calling `next_test`. This just retains an existing pattern and all that, but I think this pattern of testing makes for hard to read & maintain tests. It looks like all of these could just be: test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo && [...] I.e. the only thing that's being done here is to piggy-back on the test count to create a unique repo.