Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> IOW, do you want the above to read >> >> if test -n "$GIT_TEST_REFTABLE" >> then >> test_set_prereq REFTABLE >> else >> test_set_prereq REFFILES >> fi >> >> when both series are in effect? > > Yes, but on 2nd thought it's probably better to stick with just > REFFILES, and rewrite any reftable specific tests as !REFFILES. I guess that is both good enough and simpler. The only possible downside is that it would be cumbersome if we ever need to support the third ref backend, but I expect that it won't happen before the reftable support solidifies, and under that assumption, the simpler the better. Thanks.
