On Mon, Apr 19 2021, Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This is more explicit, and reduces the depency between test functions. It also > is more amenable to use with reftable, which has no concept of (non)existence of > a reflog > > Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > t/t5304-prune.sh | 9 +++------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/t/t5304-prune.sh b/t/t5304-prune.sh > index b447ce56a9b2..4ffc0076801e 100755 > --- a/t/t5304-prune.sh > +++ b/t/t5304-prune.sh > @@ -94,26 +94,22 @@ test_expect_success 'prune: prune nonsense parameters' ' > ' > > test_expect_success 'prune: prune unreachable heads' ' > - Similar to a previous comments, a few tests in that file use this whitespacing. I'd say let's just leave it alone unlress we're doing some whitespace-only commit earlier. > git config core.logAllRefUpdates false && > - mv .git/logs .git/logs.old && > : > file2 && Also, if we're re-styling things: ">foo" instead of ": >foo".
