Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So let's just remove it instead of fixing the bug, clearly nobody's > cared enough to complain. Hmph, is that a safe assumption? They may have just assumed that you did not break it and kept using plaintext without knowing? If we do not give a warning when sending over an unencrypted channel in red flashing letters, that is more likely explanation than nobody caring that we saw no breakage reports, no?
