Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2. We have descriptive long name for every other option, and it'd be an > exception if we'd have none for --diff-merges=m. In fact, it's > --diff-merges=m that could have been removed, but it'd break resemblance > with --cc and -c that both do have their --diff-merges=cc and > --diff-merges=c counterparts. Hmph, a devil's advocate in me suspects that it may just be arguing why user-configurable 'default' is a bad idea, though.
