On 4/8/21 4:33 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Chinmoy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:From: Chinmoy Chakraborty <chinmoy12c@xxxxxxxxx> This kills the_repository dependency in cache_tree_update() and prime_cache_tree(). Signed-off-by: Chinmoy Chakraborty <chinmoy12c@xxxxxxxxx> --- Replace the_repository with rHuh???
Sorry I forgot to change the cover letter.
The patch assumes that istate->repo will always set, but it does not even try to justify why that assumption is safe to make (e.g. "the entire codebase that leads to this function has been audited and made sure istate at this point will always have its .repo member is set" in the log message, if such an audit has actually been done, may have been convincing), which I find quite troubling.
Is it safe to make this assumption? I mean to be completely sure of this, one would have to track back to all the callers. Should a check like: if(!istate->repo) istate->repo = the_repository; be required?
