Re: should git maintenance prefetch be taught to honor remote.fetch refspec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/5/2021 4:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> $ git config --local --get-regexp "pr-924"
>> remote.pr-924.url https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git
>> remote.pr-924.fetch +refs/tags/pr-924/derrickstolee/maintenance/refspec-v1
>>
>> Seems legal, fetch even works
> 
> Yes.  For a ref that is one-shot use (like PR tags), this does not
> make much sense, but
> 
>     [remote "submaintainer1"]
> 	url = ... repository of submaintainer #1 ...
> 	fetch = master
> 	tagopts = --no-tags
> 
> is a reasonable thing to have for those who regularly work with
> submaintainer(s) of their project.  They'd do
> 
> 	$ git pull submaintainer1
> 
> to accept the work their submaintainers have done.

Thanks for the extra testing! I'll be sure to fix this bug in v2.

-Stolee
 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux