Re: should git maintenance prefetch be taught to honor remote.fetch refspec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> $ git config --local --get-regexp "pr-924"
> remote.pr-924.url https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git
> remote.pr-924.fetch +refs/tags/pr-924/derrickstolee/maintenance/refspec-v1
>
> Seems legal, fetch even works

Yes.  For a ref that is one-shot use (like PR tags), this does not
make much sense, but

    [remote "submaintainer1"]
	url = ... repository of submaintainer #1 ...
	fetch = master
	tagopts = --no-tags

is a reasonable thing to have for those who regularly work with
submaintainer(s) of their project.  They'd do

	$ git pull submaintainer1

to accept the work their submaintainers have done.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux