Re: [GSoC] Draft Proposal (Convert submodule to builtin)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/2/21 11:02 AM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
Looking from your proposal, you seems like you're using Kali Linux as
daily driver. Why do you do that?

Well I've tried various Linux distros (including ubuntu, mint). I have been

using Kali linux for 4 years now, and at this point of time it's rather just

a personal preference. I am interested in pen testing too as a general

hobby, so I need the tool-set provided by Kali every once in a while :).


I know these helper functions will be required for porting `git-submodule.sh`
and used by `module_add()`, but do you have any justification for these?

All the functions listed above was based on the previous work and discussions.

I read through all the versions of the patches and studied the issues faced

and then structured a proper skeleton of the design. You may follow the

previous work through :

https://lore.kernel.org/git/20201214231939.644175-1-periperidip@xxxxxxxxx/


Anyway, I copy-pasted the quotation above from your proposal in PDF format.
but when I pasted it into text-only mail, it looks rather ugly.
So next time when sending GSoC proposal for Git, I would like to see
proposals in Markdown format (as well as PDF) for the reason above.

Thanks.

Sure I'll do that :). Thanks for the review.


Regards,

Chinmoy Chakraborty.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux