Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年3月20日周六 上午12:01写道： > > "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > There is a small question: in the case of --reroll-count=<n>, "n" is an > > integer, we output "n-1" in the patch instead of "m" specified by > > --previous-count=<m>,Should we switch the priority of these two: let "m" > > output? > > In principle, if the end-user can explicitly give an input that may > (or may not) contradict what the code would automatically compute, > we should treat the latter as a fallback default and use it only > when the former is not given. So, I would think the answer is "yes, > we should use <m> and not <n>-1, if <m> is given". I have always felt that this issue needs attention before, Although this `previous-count` may have nothing to do with the patch of this version, thank you for answering this doubt for me.
