Re: [PATCH v7] format-patch: allow a non-integral version numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>     There is a small question: in the case of --reroll-count=<n>, "n" is an
>     integer, we output "n-1" in the patch instead of "m" specified by
>     --previous-count=<m>,Should we switch the priority of these two: let "m"
>     output?

In principle, if the end-user can explicitly give an input that may
(or may not) contradict what the code would automatically compute,
we should treat the latter as a fallback default and use it only
when the former is not given.  So, I would think the answer is "yes,
we should use <m> and not <n>-1, if <m> is given".



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux