Re: [PATCH 27/27] cache-tree: integrate with sparse directory entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/1/2021 6:54 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:42 AM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In this test, I also used "echo >>README.md" to append a line to the
>> README.md file, so the 'git add .' command is doing _something_ other
>> than a no-op. Without this edit (and FS Monitor enabled) the small
>> tree case again gains about 30ms on the sparse index case.
> 
> Meaning the small tree is 30 ms faster than reported here, or 30 ms
> slower, or that both sparse index and small tree are faster but the
> small tree decreases its time more than the sparse index one does?
> 
> Sorry, I don't mean to be dense, I'm just struggling with
> understanding words today it seems.  (Also, it seems like there's a
> joke in there about me being "dense" in a review of a "sparse"
> feature...but I'm not quite coming up with it.)

I don't blame you! This is a lot to digest, and I appreciate you
pushing through to the end of it.

Clearly, I was getting a bit inexact near the end. My excitement
to share this RFC clearly overshadowed my attention to grammatical
detail. I'll go through your feedback more carefully soon and
hopefully clarify these and many other questions.

Thanks,
-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux