Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Likewise, I'm not sure that one can reliably rot13 an output for > test_i18ncmp. It could contain mixed translated and untranslated bits > from different messages. As long as <rot13>...</rot13> marking can be trusted (and it cannot be, but if we declare it is OK to punt, then by definition we can), I think the messages can be compared. > So I dunno. You did find two spots where translations could be used. > But if nobody actually saw them to care that they got translated, were > they important? I may be a bit biased as somebody who would not use the > translations in the first place, of course. I viewed the series with interest, mostly (i.e. 80%+) for its "fun value"; I tend to agree with you that I doubt its usefulness.