Re: [PATCH 1/4] object-name.c: rename from sha1-name.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/29/2020 6:52 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
> Generalize the last remnants of "sha" and "sha1" in this file and rename
> it to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  list-objects-filter.c        |  2 +-
>  sha1-name.c => object-name.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  Makefile                     |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>  rename sha1-name.c => object-name.c (99%)

I was tempted to recommend making the content changes to
sha1-name.c in a preperatory patch then doing a patch that
preforms an exact rename (along with edits to Makefile and
list-objects-filter.c).

However, I talked myself out of it while writing this
response. Having an exact rename won't materially change
how "git log --follow" or "git blame" behave.
 
Thanks,
-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux