Re: Git Feature Request (Fixdown in interactive rebase)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.12.20 um 23:21 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> I wonder if we deliberately designed how each insn you can write in
> the todo list should come up with the authorship data (i.e. ident
> and timestamp), or if we are just using the natural consequence of
> how the implementation happens to work?  I think it makes sense for
> "fixup", as an instruction used to make a small tweak to the bulk of
> work you've done some time ago, to use the authorship information of
> the original commit that gets fixed up. I don't know offhand what
> other insns like "edit", "reword", etc. do, and if there is a room
> to improve them.

For 'squash' it was a deliberate decision to keep authorship of the
first commit, see 81ab1cb43a87. Initially, 'edit' changed authorship
including the date to the current author and date; that was changed to
preserve them, but I cannot find the responsible commit.

-- Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux