On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:32:46PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> By the way, es/config-hooks does not seem to pass 5411 (at least) > >> even as a standalone topic, and has been kicked out of 'seen' for > >> some time. Has anybody took a look into the issue? > > > > Yeah, I looked at it today. Looks like an issue with not paying > > attention to master->main default config, since I added a new test to > > the 5411 suite (which means it wouldn't have made a conflict for someone > > to say "ah yes, s/master/main/g"). I am tracking down couple of other CI > > errors today and will send a reroll today or tomorrow. > > Thanks. I don't have a reroll today. I have been trying to get to the bottom of a test which fails when built with clang but passes when built with gcc (t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh after patch 12 of the part II series) and have not made progress on that, let alone on the other tasks I wanted to do before sending the next version. Next week I will only work one day, so I'd anticipate a reroll sometime the week following. Sorry for the wait - but I think even if I sent it with the fix for this t5411 failure, it would still break 'seen' because of whatever this clang vs. gcc problem is. Hope you enjoy your holidays. - Emily
