Ernst Reissner <rei3ner@xxxxxxxx> writes: > To keep backward compatibility, > maybe it is a good idea to add a second suffix, maybe 'untracked' to > display in addition. It won't work for folks who have used output from "describe --dirty" as the base of their version number, as their procedure do not know they need to strip "-untracked" at the end. A new option, "describe --dirty --untracked", is possible, though.