Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] make "mktag" use fsck_tag()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 26 2020, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> Now a non-RFC. I went for the approach I suggested in
>> <87r1ognv4b.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of just having fsck_tag() able to
>> optionally tell us about its parsed tag/type, thus avoiding any need
>> for a custom parser in mktag.c. Hopefully I've addressed the rest of
>> the feedback, range-diff below.
>
> Ping @ Jeff & brian: you said you wanted this in one shape or another,
> so mind seeing if the v2 looks good to you?:)
>
> Junio didn't pick it up for the "What's Cooking" sent out recently,
> hopefully some reviewer ACK/NACK will help move it forward. Thanks!

True.  I don't want to queue too many topics on 'seen', only to end
up with a pile of patches that haven't been reviewed adequately and
cannot move forward.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux