Re: [PATCH 2/2] config: allow specifying config entries via envvar pairs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 17 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> I especially do not think we want to read from unbounded number of
>>> GIT_CONFIG_KEY_<N> variables like this patch does.  How would a
>>> script cleanse its environment to protect itself from stray such
>>> environment variable pair?  Count up from 1 to forever?  Run "env"
>>> and grep for "GIT_CONFIG_KEY_[0-9]*=" (the answer is No.  What if
>>> some environment variables have newline in its values?)
>>
>> You only have to unset `GIT_CONFIG_KEY_1` as the parser will stop
>> iterating on the first missing key. More generally, if you set `n` keys,
>> it's sufficient to unset key `n+1`.
>
> Yes, but those who want to set N keys would likely to be content
> with setting 1..N and happily forget unsetting N+1, and that is
> where "how would one cleanse the environment to give a clean slate?"
> comes from.

Not as an argument from whataboutism, but just to note a bug/existing
prior art:

Nobody in this thread has mentioned GIT_PUSH_OPTION_* which works pretty
much like Patrick's suggestion, and it looks like --local-env-vars
misses those:

    $ GIT_PUSH_OPTION_0=foo GIT_PUSH_OPTION_COUNT=20 git rev-parse --local-env-vars | grep GIT_PUSH
    $

I haven't tested this, but I expect there's a bug where a push hook
itself does a local push to another repo and that repo has a hook, that
the push options are erroneously carried forward to the sub-process.

That might also be a feature, depending on your point of view.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux