Re: [PATCH 2/2] config: allow specifying config entries via envvar pairs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

>> I especially do not think we want to read from unbounded number of
>> GIT_CONFIG_KEY_<N> variables like this patch does.  How would a
>> script cleanse its environment to protect itself from stray such
>> environment variable pair?  Count up from 1 to forever?  Run "env"
>> and grep for "GIT_CONFIG_KEY_[0-9]*=" (the answer is No.  What if
>> some environment variables have newline in its values?)
>
> You only have to unset `GIT_CONFIG_KEY_1` as the parser will stop
> iterating on the first missing key. More generally, if you set `n` keys,
> it's sufficient to unset key `n+1`.

Yes, but those who want to set N keys would likely to be content
with setting 1..N and happily forget unsetting N+1, and that is
where "how would one cleanse the environment to give a clean slate?"
comes from.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux