Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] merge-ort: use histogram diff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/11/2020 11:47 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:54 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/2/2020 3:43 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
>>> I have some ideas for using a histogram diff to improve content merges,
>>> which fundamentally relies on the idea of a histogram.  Since the diffs
>>> are never displayed to the user but just used internally for merging,
>>> the typical user preference shouldn't matter anyway, and I want to make
>>> sure that all my testing works with this algorithm.
>>>
>>> Granted, I don't yet know if those ideas will pan out and I haven't even
>>> tried any of them out yet, but it's easy to change the diff algorithm in
>>> the future if needed or wanted.  For now, just set it to histogram.
>>
>> If you are not making use of the histogram yet, then could you set this
>> patch aside until you _do_ use it? Or are there performance implications
>> that are also a side benefit?
> 
> Long story...

...

> Does that help?

In summary, you have some concrete reasons to prefer the histogram
diff other than just "I have some ideas that might pan out later" so
this code change is a good one but could be better justified in the
commit message. Does that sound correct?

Thanks,
-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux