Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Thanks Peff for pointing the root cause. Will use the "gently" forms >> of packet_write_fmt() and packet_flush() in patch v3. > > Another thing I noticed. Its tests are based on a codebase where > master is called main, which means it is not designed to be usable > with the 'master' or 'maint' track. > > Because the topic is no longer "just apply a band-aid to paper over > test flakeyness" but is fixing the codepath that matters in real > user experience, I'd prefer to see it applicable even to the > maintenance track. I've queued these patches on top of js/default-branch-name-adjust-t5411; that makes the topic mergeable to 'master' but not to 'maint'. Perhaps that is good enough, as the maintenance track of today would become obsolete by the end of this year. Thanks.
