Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks Peff for pointing the root cause. Will use the "gently" forms > of packet_write_fmt() and packet_flush() in patch v3. Another thing I noticed. Its tests are based on a codebase where master is called main, which means it is not designed to be usable with the 'master' or 'maint' track. Because the topic is no longer "just apply a band-aid to paper over test flakeyness" but is fixing the codepath that matters in real user experience, I'd prefer to see it applicable even to the maintenance track. Thanks.
