> Le 14 oct. 2020 à 09:45, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:20 AM Philippe Blain > <levraiphilippeblain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Le 12 oct. 2020 à 18:47, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : >>> This is somewhat onerous to digest and compose. Have you considered >>> making it more automated and easier to read? Perhaps something like >>> this: >>> >>> create_crlf_ref () { >>> branch=$1 >>> cat >.crlf-message-$branch.txt && >>> sed -n "1,/^$/p" <.crlf-message-$branch.txt | sed "/^$/d" | append_cr >.crlf-subject-$branch.txt && >>> sed -n "/^$/,\$p" <.crlf-message-$branch.txt | sed "1d" | append_cr >.crlf-body-$branch.txt && >>> ... >>> } >>> >>> create_crlf_refs () { >>> create_crlf_ref crlf <<-\EOF >>> Subject first line >>> >>> Body first line >>> Body second line >>> EOF >>> ... >>> } >> >> I did not try to do that because I did not think of it. >> However, I think it's clearer using printf, this way '\n' and '\r' >> appear clearly on all platforms, whatever editor is in use >> and whatever settings this editor is using to hide or not hide >> control characters. > > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you are saying about editors and > hiding or not hiding control characters. There are no hidden control > characters in the example code I posted. > > The code I proposed is very explicit about using CRLF terminators. The > here-doc fed to create_crlf_ref() contains only the normal LF, but > then create_crlf_ref() explicitly converts those to CRLF by calling > append_cr(). Sorry, I missed that. I'll try to see if I can make it simpler using this approach then.