Re: [PATCH 2/2] ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:29:52 -0700
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@xxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5c889e487d344efd1a0eb0cb5b717375de450c89.1602451631.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:27:11 +0000")
References: <pull.748.git.1602451631.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <5c889e487d344efd1a0eb0cb5b717375de450c89.1602451631.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:

> Let's be even more defensive by catching all kinds of exceptions,
> logging them as warnings, and continue the run without skipping it
> (after all, if the check fails, we _want_ to continue with the run).

Yeah, looks sensible.

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive
  - From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
- [PATCH 2/2] ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive
  - From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive
Next by Date: Re: Patchwork now does the right thing with GGG submissions
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux