Re: [PATCH 0/2] ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:

> Phil just reported that the check I added failed miserably
> [https://github.com/phil-blain/git/runs/1238660958] in their fork, and the 
> entire run would be abandoned. That's totally unintended, and was caused by
> a different metadata format for older recorded runs.

Thanks for a quick response to breakage.

> Let's work around this particular issue, and then make the entire check a
> lot more robust.
>
> This patch series is based on js/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests.

Will queue.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux